Joey Caudill
Bio
Recruiting
Scouting Report
Caudill is a 6-foot-5, 215-230 pound converted quarterback/linebacker projecting to tight end, and one of the more traits-over-production evaluations in Ohio's 2026 class. He carries a 0.8928 composite (four-star, No. 434 nationally, No. 65 TE per 247Sports) largely on frame and athletic profile rather than reps at the position — he has never played tight end. Michigan State identified him in January 2025 as its first 2026 commitment and signed him in December, and he enrolled early in January 2026 to begin the position transition a full semester ahead of schedule.
Physical Profile
Long-levered 6-5 build with legitimate room to add 30-40 pounds; listing discrepancies between 215 (MSU/On3) and 232 (247Sports) reflect an ongoing mass-gain project rather than a measurement dispute. Frame is currently basketball-lean, and he backs that up on the hardwood as a multi-year all-district selection — the body control, hip flexibility, and contested-catch radius that shows up in that sport are the core of the tight-end projection. Play speed is functional rather than elite; 671 rushing yards on 126 carries (5.3 ypc) as a quarterback confirms he's a build-up strider with real second-level burst but not a vertical seam-stretcher who wins on pure top-end. Explosive-athlete testing hasn't been the calling card; the value is length plus coordination in a frame that hasn't been filled out.
Play Style
On film he is the offense — a downhill, physical runner who will lower a shoulder rather than slide, and a rhythm passer who throws with anticipation off play-action. The Clear Fork game is the representative tape: 329 total yards, 15-of-24 for 228 and two scores, plus 161 rushing yards including a 69-yard breakaway, with the go-ahead production coming in the fourth quarter. Defensively he plays with genuine violence at the point of attack and has the ball skills to make plays on the ball (48-yard pick-six against Wooster). The through-line in both phases is competitive toughness and situational awareness rather than freak-athlete flashes; he wins by playing faster than he times and by being the most physically imposing player on a Division II field.
Strengths
- Elite positional versatility with legitimate two-way production — first-team All-Ohio, Ohio Cardinal Conference Defensive Player of the Year AND Northwest District Offensive Player of the Year in the same season, while lining up at QB, linebacker, defensive end and safety. That defensive resume is the tell for a tight end: he is a willing, physical striker who initiates contact, which is the trait most HS receiving tight ends lack.
- Quarterback processing that transfers directly to route-running. Threw 112-of-189 for 1,730 yards and 25 touchdowns against eight turnovers-worthy decisions, running a real progression offense to a 9-2 record, an OCC title and a playoff berth. He understands leverage, zone windows and where the soft spot in a coverage is because he spent three years reading it from under center — 247Sports' Allen Trieu specifically flagged the QB-to-TE lineage as the reason he'll 'translate with ease.'
- Catch radius and body control from a legitimate high-major basketball background. The rebounding and post-up traits — boxing out, high-pointing, adjusting to off-target throws in traffic — are the same skills that produce a reliable red-zone target, and they're already refined even though his tight-end reps are at zero.
Areas to Improve
- Everything about playing the position in a three-point stance. He has no meaningful reps as an in-line blocker: no hand placement fundamentals, no combo-block or down-block technique, no leverage habits against a 265-pound defensive end, and no experience releasing off the line against press from a body-on-body alignment. This is not a refinement need — it is a from-scratch build, and it is the single variable that determines whether he's a Y tight end or gets capped as a slot/F-only piece.
- Functional mass and lower-body strength. At 215-230 on a 6-5 frame he does not currently have the anchor to hold up in the run game or sustain against Big Ten edge defenders, and adding the required 30+ pounds without eroding the basketball-derived movement skills is the central developmental risk. His four-school offer sheet (MSU, Miami OH, Toledo, Western Michigan) with only one Power Four offer suggests the industry priced in that risk even as the composite rating stayed in the four-star band.
College Projection
True developmental redshirt with a defined runway. Early enrollment in January 2026 was the right call and gives him spring ball, summer, and a redshirt season — realistically three semesters of position-specific coaching — before he's asked to contribute. Expect Year 1 on scout team and in the weight room targeting 245-250 pounds, Year 2 as a special-teams contributor and situational move/F tight end in 12-personnel and red-zone packages where his catch radius plays immediately, and a realistic path to a starting role in Years 3-4 if the in-line blocking develops. The floor is a fifth-year rotational TE2; the ceiling is a multi-year Big Ten starter. Tight end coach Brian Wozniak's track record with the position group is the key variable, and Caudill's own stated evaluation of himself — physicality and football IQ — matches what that room asks of a Y.
NFL Outlook
Late-round or priority-free-agent projection at this stage, with meaningful upside if the build-out goes well. The archetype — 6-5 high school quarterback with a basketball background converting to tight end — has a real NFL success rate, but the ones who get drafted are almost always the ones who become competent in-line blockers, and that's the piece Caudill hasn't started. Evaluate him again after his redshirt sophomore season: if he's playing at 250+ with functional hands-in-the-dirt technique and 25-30 catches, he becomes a genuine Day 3 conversation. If he tops out as a 235-pound slot-only target with a limited route tree, he's a college-productive player without a pro position. Too much projection remains for a confident grade either way.
Best Fit
A pro-style, TE-heavy offense with a patient staff and an established position coach — which is precisely why Michigan State was the correct landing spot rather than a lucky one. Jonathan Smith's offenses have historically leaned on 12-personnel and asked tight ends to both block in-line and win as intermediate targets, giving Caudill a defined developmental path instead of a spread system that would use him as an oversized slot and never build the run-blocking foundation. He needs a program that will redshirt him without pressure, invest two full offseasons of strength work, and has a veteran tight end room to learn behind. He is a poor fit for an air-raid or tempo spread that would exploit the receiving traits immediately while permanently capping his ceiling.
Player Comparison
Both share the ideal 6'5" frame with lean but athletic build that projects to multiple positions - likely tight end or wide receiver. Butt was similarly ranked as a solid 4-star prospect (#400s nationally) from the Midwest with strong fundamentals, suggesting both have the versatility and developmental upside that college coaches value in taller, athletic prospects who can grow into their frames.